Judge Rules LifeLock’s Fraud Alert Service Illegal
In a decision that has privacy advocates and others scratching their
heads, a federal judge has ruled that LifeLock has been
breaking California law for years by placing fraud alerts on its
customer’s credit profiles.
The decision is a blow to the burgeoning identify-theft protection industry, and means that companies that experience data breaches may no longer be able to offer victims free subscriptions to such services — a
standard damage-control tactic in recent years. Consumers can still place fraud alerts by contacting one of the three U.S. credit reporting agencies directly.
Bo Holland, founder and CEO of Debix, a competitor of LifeLock, called the ruling “dramatic and unexpected.”
“It causes a real shift in the industry,” he told Threat Level.
The pre-trial partial summary judgment comes in a lawsuit filed last year against LifeLock by Experian, one of the nation’s three credit reporting bureaus. Experian claimed LifeLock is trying to “game the system” of fraud alerts to make a profit.
LifeLock, a controversial company that gained notoriety for publishing its CEO’s Social Security number in advertisements
charges $120 a year to consumers to place fraud alerts on their credit profiles, among other services. The company also offers a $1 million guarantee to reimburse the expenses of any customer who suffers losses from identity theft while subscribed to LifeLock.
Continue Reading at WIRED
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=a8880c88-877f-4f21-97f7-eed51d10c680)
On the Internet you can never be sure if the person with who you are speaking is who he says he is. With so much personal data left in the social media, identity theft is something very common today. This is why you need identity theft protection, you can find more about it here: http://www.noidentitytheft.com/
ReplyDelete